The Lytton Band of Pomo Indians is a federally recognized tribe of PomoNative Americans. They were recognized in the late 1980s, as lineal descendants of the two families who lived at the Lytton Rancheria in Healdsburg, California from 1937 to about 1960. The tribe now has around 275 enrolled members. It has a casino in San Pablo, California, and has proposed to build housing for tribe members, plus a winery and a hotel, just west of Windsor, California, in Sonoma County.

History[edit]

The tribe was founded in 1937 by Bert Steele, who was one-quarter Achomawi and part Nomlaki, and his wife, a Pomo from Bodega Bay, when they successfully petitioned the U.S. Office of Indian Affairs for the right to build on a 50-acre (200,000 m²) plot north of Healdsburg north of Lytton Station Road after Steele's home was destroyed in a flood. Along with his brother-in-law, John Myers, and his wife, Mary Myers Steele (both Pomo from Sonoma), he moved onto the land, which the government had set aside for Native Americans.^[1] This land became the Lytton Rancheria and the namesake for the tribe.

In 1958, in accordance with a policy of assimilating Native Americans into the rest of American society, Congress terminated the federal trust in the reservations lands of over forty California bands, including the Lytton Rancheria. The Lytton band was dissolved and its land was deeded to its members. As part of the agreement, the government agreed to perform several improvements on the land, such as building roads and installing sewage service, but failed to do so. Within a year, the land-owning Lyttons had all sold, for reasons that are not clear; some current tribe members say that their ancestors did not understand property taxes and so were forced to sell, while other sources dispute that claim.

Comprehensive Guide to Playing Slots in America Every online casino player knows the excitement of playing slots. It’s no surprise that slots are the most popular casino game in US online casinos. The simplicity of the rules, the variety of games, and the flexibility of playing on any type of budget are what make it a game for every type of casino player.

In 1991 the Lyttons successfully petitioned the government to restore their tribal status. Though the Lytton Band does not divulge a complete list of members, as of April 5, 2005 there are about 275 members.^[2]

Other bands of Pomo include the Guideville Band of Pomo Indians and the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians.

Language[edit]

Taken from Pomoan languages, see more: Pomoan languages

The Pomoan, or Pomo/ˈpoʊmoʊ/,^[3] languages are a small family of Native Californian languages spoken by the Pomo people who formerly occupied the valley of the Russian River and the Clear Lake basin. The Pomoan languages are severely endangered – with the exception of Kashaya, which had few dozen speakers in the 1990s, they are spoken by only a handful of elderly people. Northern Pomo and Northeastern Pomo are without known speakers and presumed to be extinct.

A vast majority of people in the Lytton Rancheria speak English.

Government[edit]

The Lytton Band of Pomo Indians Tribal Office is located on 1300 N Dutton Ave # A, Santa Rosa, CA 95401. They are governed by a democratically elected tribal council, with a working constitution.^[2] The tribe does not reveal its list of members, nor its constitution, so a majority of administration is unknown to the public. Their current administration is as follows:

• Marjorie Mejia, Tribal Chairperson^[2]

Casino in San Pablo[edit]

Acquisition[edit]

After the community of American Canyon rebuffed the Lyttons' attempts to turn an existing cardroom into a casino, the Lyttons set their sights on the city of San Pablo, home of the Casino San Pablo (CSP) cardroom. Cardrooms are California gambling establishments where the house has no stake in the games. Customers typically pay a fixed amount to the house per hand, regardless of whether they win or lose.

With the assistance of the city of San Pablo and the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Union, the Lyttons lobbied local Congressman George Miller to help turn Casino San Pablo into their reservation. Under the terms of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, only tribes who acquired land prior to 1988 would be eligible to operate casinos on their land.^[4] Because the Lyttons had regained their tribal status in 1991, and so were ineligible. Miller added a provision to the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act of 2000 that took CSP into federal trust and backdated its acquisition to 1988. When President Clinton signed the bill into law, the Lyttons gained the right to turn the CSP, formerly a low-stakes cardroom, into a full-fledged casino with much more profitable gambling devices and games such as slot machines and blackjack.

Miller's backdating clause, in a section labeled 'technical corrections,' has been described as 'midnight legislation' and 'underhanded'. Professor I. Nelson Rose, a gambling law expert from Whittier College, said the bill 'bordered on illegal'. Others dispute that the language was added inappropriately; a former staffer for U.S. Senator Daniel Inouye described the process as nothing out of the ordinary, saying, 'That's the way the republic works'.^[4]

Expansion plans[edit]

In order to operate so-called Class III games, such as slot machines, Native American casinos must negotiate a compact with the state; the Lyttons have revised their casino plans several times in the hopes of procuring such a compact from California. One element of the plan has been the Lyttons' request that the state grant them a monopoly on gaming within a 35-mile (56 km) radius of CSP.

After acquiring CSP, the Lyttons announced plans to expand it from 70,000 square feet (6,500 m²) into a 600,000-square-foot (56,000 m²), six- to eight-story casino, with up to 5,000 slot machines,^[5] which would make it bigger than the MGM Grand casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) expressed opposition in 2003, citing concerns that 'off-reservation gambling' would be a strain on local resources, aggravate traffic congestion and increase crime.^[6] But on August 19, 2004, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced an agreement to create such a casino, an agreement that required approval by the State Legislature and the U.S. Department of the Interior.^[7]

There was immediate local opposition to the agreement, including the California Assemblywoman Loni Hancock, and mayor of the neighboring city of Richmond.^[8] Facing bipartisan opposition from the California State Legislature, within a week of the agreement with the governor, the Lyttons revised the proposed figure to 2,500 slots.^[9]

In February 2005, San Pablo City Council voted unanimously to urge state legislators to pass the required enabling act, while in the city council in nearby Albany unanimously voted to oppose that.^[10] In April 2005, U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) attacked the proposed compact.^[11] Tribal spokespeople countered that the casino was 'the final act in redressing the wrongs', the reparations for the government's dissolution of their tribe's legal status and reservation lands. In addition, they said the casino would create 6,600 jobs and would provide the city, county, and state governments with 25 percent of gaming revenue.^[2]

In August 2005, after failing to get a compact based on the revised plan, the Lyttons added 500 'video bingo' machines to CSP.^[12] As Class II machines, these did not require a state compact.^[13] By mid-2006 there were over 800 new gaming devices in use.^[14]

In 2007, the tribe reached an agreement with Feinstein: the tribe would no longer try to get approval to build a larger casino, or get Class III slot machines, and Feinstein would drop legislation that would have forced the tribe to go through rigorous federal and state approvals to offer even the existing Class II gaming in their casino.^[15]

Operations[edit]

Annual proceeds from the casino were estimated to be more than $180 million annually as of 2014.^[16] Under a 1999 Municipal Services Agreement,^[17] the tribe pays the city of San Pablo 7.5 percent of revenues;^[14] in 2014, that was more than $15 million,^[17] a decrease from $22.6 million in 2003.^[18] The amount is tied to the casino's status as a Class II facility. If it became a Class III (Las Vegas-type) facility, the annual payment amount would be much smaller.^[17] The tribe pays nothing to the State of California.^[14]

As of 2011, about 200 workers at the casino belonged to a union, Unite Here Local 2850. That year, their average salary was $9.50 per hour.^[19] In May 2014, after years of dispute, the union and the tribe reached an agreement that provided for wage increases and minimized the increase in health care costs to be paid by employees.^[18]

Charity[edit]

The Lytton Band of Pomo Indians supports many charities. Their current sponsorship as follows:

• Schulz Celebrity Golf Classic^[20]
• Luther Burbank Center for the Arts ^[21]
• Windsor Fire Protection District^[22]
• The Boys & Girls Club of Central Sonoma County^[22]
• PDI Surgery Center in Windsor^[22]

Sonoma County lands[edit]

In 2002, an investor group that had collaborated with the tribe on the San Pablo casino project purchased 50 acres of land west of Windsor, California, a town just to the south of Healdsburg.^[23] The tribe, which expected to acquire that land from the investor group, said it wanted to build homes, a community center and a ceremonial roundhouse on the land.^[24] The Windsor town council responded by going on record as opposing the tribe's plans to develop the land beyond the one home per five acres allowed by the county's general plan.^[25]

In April 2009, the tribe applied to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) to have 100 acres of land - it had purchased more land to the west of Windsor - taken into federal trust. The tribe said it wanted to build 145 homes and a community center for tribal members on the site. In May, the Windsor town council voted 4-1 to oppose the tribe's plans. Tribal representatives said if they could not get Windsor to extend utility service to the land, they would use well water and build their own sewer plant.^[25]

In 2012 and 2013, the tribe purchased more than a dozen properties in Sonoma County, paying more than $47 million. About 2,000 acres were owned by the end of 2013, including more than $22 million of vineyards and pasture in the Alexander and Russian River Valleys, 650 acres near the Sonoma Coast, and about 400 acres in the Windsor area.^[26]

In March 2015, the Sonoma County supervisors approved an agreement with the tribe that prohibits the tribe from developing a casino, but allows development of a 200,000-case winery and a 200-room resort. Under the 22-year agreement, the tribe would pay the county $6.1 million for one-time impacts, and would pay the same property taxes and hotel-bed taxes that would be required if the lands were not in federal trust. A representative for the tribe said that future plans could also involve building 214 houses in addition to the approximately 150 it had proposed in its application to BIA.^[27]

In May 2015, Congressman Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) introduced a bill to take land near Windsor, owned by the tribe, into federal trust for housing and other non-gaming purposes as part of a new Lytton Rancheria reservation for the tribe.^[28][29] Huffman said he proposed to create the Indian lands through an act of Congress instead of through the BIA process because a Congressional act could completely prevent a casino, and could bring more certainty over what could be built and how the impacts would be offset.^[30] In July, opponents packed a Windsor town council meeting to request that the council oppose Huffman's bill.^[31]

The tribe, which has given millions of dollars to the Windsor school and fire districts to offset the impacts from its planned housing project, is negotiating with the town of Windsor to get water and sewer service. Such an agreement would have to be approved by Windsor voters because the tribal housing project is outside the town’s urban growth boundary.^[32] In exchange, the tribe would build a 30-meter-long pool, which could be used by the Windsor High School swim team, a second pool for recreational use, restrooms, a changing facility, a community building, and parking, near the High School and the town center.^[16]

References[edit]

1. ^Artichoke Joe's California et al. v. Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, Memorandum of Order and Opinion, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
2. ^ ^abcd'LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA'(PDF). U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. pp. 17–19. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
3. ^Laurie Bauer, 2007, The Linguistics Student’s Handbook, Edinburgh
4. ^ ^abBernice Yeung (June 6, 2001) 'Gambling Their Future'. San Francisco Weekly
5. ^Robinson, Bruce. 'How Many Indian Casinos Are Too Many?' Gambling Magazine. July 24, 2005
6. ^Josh Richman (September 27, 2003) 'Dianne Feinstein bill would delay Indian casinoArchived September 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.' Oakland Tribune.
7. ^Murphy, Dean E. (August 20, 2004). 'California Deal Authorizes Huge Casino Near Oakland'. The New York Times. ISSN0362-4331. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
8. ^John M. Hubbell, Cecilia M. Vega (August 19, 2004) 'Politicians shocked by casino deal; size of project alarms mayor, congressman'. San Francisco Chronicle.
9. ^Morain, Dan; Morin, Monte (August 23, 2004). 'Tribe Scales Back Casino Plan'. Los Angeles Times. ISSN0458-3035. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
10. ^Brenneman, Richard Berkeley Daily Planet (February 25, 2005). 'San Pablo Casino Pits City v. City, Gambler v. Gambler'. Berkeley Daily Planet. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
11. ^Zachary Coile (April 6, 2005) 'McCain blasts tribe over bill allowing San Pablo casino; Bush likely to support Feinstein proposal to derail pact with governor'. San Francisco Chronicle.
12. ^Zamora, Jim Herron (August 2, 2005). 'More distraction than attraction for video bingo; confusion reigns as casino unleashes flashy new game'. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
13. ^Janine DeFao (July 31, 2005) 'Video bingo machines are tribe's new gamble; devices no different from slots, say critics of East Bay casino'. San Francisco Chronicle.
14. ^ ^abcSweeney, James P. (May 27, 2006). 'Casino finds a wild card in knockoff slots | T'. The San Diego Union-Tribune. Copley News Service. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
15. ^Coile, Zachary (May 10, 2007). 'Indians, Feinstein strike deal that keeps casino from growing'. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
16. ^ ^abMason, Clark (November 3, 2014). 'Windsor may trade water service to tribe in exchange for swimming pool'. Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
17. ^ ^abcLochner, Tom (July 24, 2015). 'District to discuss possible sale of Doctors Medical Center campus'. Contra Costa Times. Retrieved August 18, 2015.
18. ^ ^abRogers, Robert (May 2, 2014). 'San Pablo casino, workers reach labor agreement after years of strife'. Contra Costa Times. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
19. ^Jones, Carolyn (July 12, 2011). 'San Pablo Casino workers irked over no raises'. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
20. ^'Schulz Celebrity Golf Classic'. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
21. ^Swanson, Charlie. 'Naming Rights'. Luther Burbank Center for the Arts. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
22. ^ ^abcBWW News Desk. 'Luther Burbank Center for the Arts Returns to Historic Name'. broadwayworld.com. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
23. ^Gorenstein, Nathan (July 3, 2003). 'Katz reveals partners in casino plan'. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
24. ^Willams, Bert (April 7, 2004). 'Lytton Pomos, Windsor neighbors find communication difficult'. Sonoma West Publishers. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
25. ^ ^abMason, Clark (May 8, 2009). 'Windsor opposes tribal development'. Santa Rosa Press-Democrat.
26. ^Mason, Clark (December 1, 2013). 'Lytton Pomo tribe on buying spree in Sonoma County'. Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
27. ^Hart, Angela (March 10, 2015). 'Sonoma County approves sweeping agreement with Windsor-based Lytton Pomo tribe'. Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
28. ^Lytton Rancheria Homelands Act of 2015, H.R. 2538, May 22, 2015
29. ^'Rep. Huffman Introduces Bill to allow Lytton Rancheria to take tribal land into trust for housing and other non-gaming purposes'. Press Release, Representative Huffman's office. May 22, 2015. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
30. ^Mason, Clark (May 22, 2015). 'Rep. Jared Huffman introduces bill to take land into trust for Lytton Rancheria'. Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
31. ^Mason, Clark (July 15, 2015). 'Opponents of Lytton tribe's plans swarm Windsor meeting'. Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
32. ^Mason, Clark (March 9, 2015). 'Sonoma County, Lytton tribe set to reach development deal'. Santa Rosa Press Democrat. Retrieved August 17, 2015.

External links[edit]

Native American Slot Machines Machine

Find detailed information on US casinos in every state - both land-based and online. Our experts have compiled information regarding states who legalized onlinecasinos and details about all legal USA online casinos. We have provided knowledge on gambling specifics for each state and what types of casinos are legal in each particular state. OnAmerican Casino Guide, you will find detailed lists of every US casino resort, riverboat casino and Indian casino in the country. Just choose a state from the below list of UScasinos-by-state in order to bring up detailed information on what types of casinos are available in the respective state, a list of all casinos within the state borders, and slot machine payback statistics for all US casinos.

Click here to see Maps of Casino Locations in Every U.S. State

Online gambling guide

The states who have now moved forward with legal online gambling are as follows:

Legal online casino:

Native American Slot Machines Jackpots

• Delaware
• New Jersey
• Pennsylvania

Legal online poker:

• Nevada
• Delaware
• New Jersey
• Pennsylvania

Legal Online Sportsbooks:

• Rhode Island
• West Virginia
• New Jersey
• Pennsylvania

USA online casinos

The online casino USA market is definitely starting to grow. The domino effect is taking place, now that states are seeing the financial benefits of legal online casinos. The laws surroundingUSA online casinos are specific to the state where they are licensed. Ultimately it is up to the state to decide whether or not to legalize online casinos. We have seen the biggest impact oflegalizing online casinos in the state of New Jersey thus far.

In New Jersey, the online casino market is flourishing. There is a long list of legal online casinos - all of which are remaining competitive in this flourishing market. The current list oflegal NJ Casinos are as follows:

• Golden Nugget
• Virgin Online Casino
• Caesars Casino Online
• Borgata Online
• Tropicana Online
• SugarHouse Online Casino
• Betfair NJ
• 888 NJ
• Pala Online Casino
• Harrah’s Online Casino
• Resorts Online Casino
• Mohegan Sun Online
• DraftKings Casino
• Party Casino
• PlayMGM
• Ocean Resort Online
• PokerStars NJ
• Hard Rock Online
• BetAmerica
• Unibet Casino

Legal online casino gambling was recently just passed through legislation in Pennsylvania, meaning online casinos are on their way in the Keystone State. The projected list of online casinos in Pennsylvania are as follows:

• Harrah’s
• Hollywood at Penn National
• Mount Airy
• Parx
• SugarHouse
• Valley Forge
• Presque Isle Downs
• Sands Bethlehem
• Stadium Park Philly Live! Casino
• Mohegan Sun Pocono
• MGM Resorts
• Golden Nugget NJ

The only other state in America with legal online casino gambling is in fact, Delaware, and just like the state’s size, the list is quite small. The legal online casinos inDelaware are as follows:

• Delaware Park Online
• Dover Downs
• Harrington Online

Here at American Casino Guide, we have thorough reviews on each legal online casino in the USA. In our comprehensive online casino reviews, you will find useful information about eachsite and how it affects you as a player. Review briefs on the game selections offered at each site along with some of their most popular game titles.Learn about the software providers and interface design of these sites as well as their mobile apps and how efficient each application runs. See the banking options allowed at each site so thatyou can be sure your preferred withdrawal and deposit methods are available on your favorite online casinos. And finally, see what kinds of casino bonuses and specialpromotions are being offered at these casinos so that you can achieve the maximum amount of free play on your favorite casino games!

American Casino Guide - land-based establishments

There are many different kinds of casinos throughout the United States. Depending on your location in the country, there could be a mix of the following casinos:

• Indian casinos
• Pari-mutuel casinos
• Land-based casinos
• Riverboat casinos
• Casino boats

Just choose a state from the American casino guide below, organized by state, and have a look at the detailed information of each. The information provided includes:

• List of every casino in the state
• Details about each casino
• Forms of casino gambling available in that state
• Slot machine payback statistics for all U.S. casinos

Each casino listing will explain its hours of operation, games offered, hotel rates, buffet prices, minimum gambling age, photos, maps, directions and more! You can even read and write your ownreview for each casino.

LISTED BELOW ARE LINKS TO ALL CASINOS IN EVERY STATE

Indian Casinos

Indian casinos, also known as Tribal casinos, are usually located on federally recognized Indian reservations. They range in size from small truck stops and convenience storesto some of the largest casinos in the country. At a small truck stop casino, you would generally find a handful of machines and these would be located in places such as Oklahoma or Wisconsin.Connecticut is home to one of the world’s largest casinos - Foxwoods Casino.

Different states have different legal agreements regarding Indian casinos. Depending on the agreement made, these Indian casinos can offer either Class II gaming or Class IIIgaming.

Class III (Class 3) gaming is what most people would describe as “normal” casino gaming. This is kind of casino gambling you would find at the majority of casinos in the country, such as LasVegas. Class III gaming involves the player playing against “the house” like in blackjack, craps, roulette, or any other table game, as well as slot machines.

Class II (Class 2) gaming, on the other hand, is slightly different. These are games where players compete against other players such as in poker and bingo. Over the years,casinos have found ways around this to offer other casino games similar to Class III games, however, adhering still to Class II rules. A great example of this would be Class II slot machinesthat closely resemble a normal, Class III machine but you will notice a small bingo card in the corner of the screen. So, in essence, you are actually playing a quicker version of virtual bingoagainst other players in the casino. The reels spin and you can see winning combinations. The reels, however, are “for entertainment purposes only” and your chances of winning are basedentirely on the bingo card in the corner.

Another example of Class II games would be player-banked table games where a player would compete against other players rather than against the casino. These look identical to traditional tablegames. The difference lays in the fact that players have to pay an ante of around $0.50-$1 per hand. In most cases there is someone who supplies the money to be the “bank” and the only moneythe casino receives is the ante made by each player.

Pari-Mutuel Casinos

Some states such as Arkansas or Delaware only allow casinos in pari-mutuel facilities. Pari-mutuel refers to locations with legalized wagering on horse or dog races; or inFlorida, jai-alai games. Since a vast majority of pari-mutuel facilities in the United States are racetracks, these types of casinos are often also known as “racinos,” a combination of thewords racetrack and casino.

Besides having legal on-property betting on horse racing, dog racing or jai-alai, these casinos are almost identical to most other land-based casinos. However, depending on the laws of thestates where they are located, some may not offer live table games, or may only have slot machines.

A somewhat new development at pari-mutuel facilities in states where traditional casino gambling is illegal is something called “historical racing machines.” These are considered Class IImachines similar to the bingo-based machines at many Indian casinos but instead of being based on a bingo card, the results of these games are based on racing results from previous horse races.

Land-Based Casinos

Land-based casinos refer to the typical casinos that people often think of when they think of a casino. An example of this would a popular casino in Las Vegas or Atlantic City. Casino gamblingwas legalized in Nevada in 1931 and it was the only state to offer that type of gambling until 1977 when New Jersey legalized casinos for its seaside resort town of Atlantic City. It is theseland-based, stand-alone, casinos that were the original forms of casinos until riverboat and Indian casinos came along in the 1990s.

Riverboat Casino Locations

Riverboat casinos are exactly what they sound like - casinos located inside riverboats. These are found in many states throughout the South and the Midwest such as Illinois,Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, and Mississippi. However, they have evolved over the years as the laws and regulations have been quite relaxed. Originally, they were required to leave the dock andcruise for several hours periodically throughout the day. In the beginning, some states even required the casinos to enact loss limits during these cruises.

Eventually, the loss limits were lifted, as were the requirements for them to cruise periodically, and they began operations constantly docked on the river. Some states later allowed thecasinos to be built on floating barges in man-made lagoons fed from the rivers. That is where most of the states are now, however some states such as Mississippi have now allowed their“riverboat” casinos to operate on land. As much as that does not make sense, the rules still require these facilities to be built within a certain distance from the water.